<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><metadata xml:lang="en">
<Esri>
<CreaDate>20221024</CreaDate>
<CreaTime>16513100</CreaTime>
<ArcGISFormat>1.0</ArcGISFormat>
<SyncOnce>TRUE</SyncOnce>
</Esri>
<dataIdInfo>
<idCitation>
<resTitle>Agriculture Preserves</resTitle>
</idCitation>
<idAbs>August 18, 2017This layer was edited to reflect a Correction. See Changes Feature Class for details.==================================================December 12, 2014This layer was edited to reflect a Correction. See Changes Feature Class for details.==================================================March 18, 2008This feature class was imported into the Planning Office GIS Database from a standalone database.=====================================================December 26, 2006The Adjusted Zoning Layer was officially accepted by the planning office and the server was updated with the new Adjusted Zoning Layer.=====================================================These data were downloaded from the vendor's website (MRF Geosystems Corp.) on Oct 17, 2006. They were placed on the server November 7-8, 2006===========================================================The following was obtained from a Word Doc, stored on Baz's Computer (creator of the Ag Preserves dataset) and dated Sept 27, 2005:Procedure used to create Ag Preserves1.	Ran UNION function (with gaps allowed) against Urban Service Areas (coverage, dated Sept 9, 2004) and "scc_zoning_base" (dated August 11, 2005) and called it "zoning_outside_usa_union".2.	Selected features from "zoning_outside_usa_union" that HAVE THEIR CENTER IN the features of Urban Service Areas. Deleted these polygons.3.	Filtered "zoning_outside_usa_union to show only A, AR, HS.4.	Ran DISSOLVE function on A, AR, HS. Did not use a "dissolve field" and made sure "multi-part" checkbox is NOT checked. Called it "zoning_outside_usa_union_dissolve3".5.	Calculated "Area_Acres" field and added a "Notes" field.6.	Edited "Zoning_outside_usa_union_dissolve3" and deleted polygons that were either slivers or did not match the original map [Accidentally deleted an "A" area to the north of Morgan Hill, re-added per discussion below REVIEW OF MAP #2].1.	Used DEFINITION QUERY on "scc_zoning_base" shapefile to filter RR and A.2.	Selected features which have their CENTER IN San Martin. Saved as "San_Martin_A_RR"3.	Deleted two polygons in the north which were already in the "zoning_outside_usa_union_dissolve3" file.4.	Ran DISSOLVE function (no dissolve field, multipart NOT checked) to create "San_Martin_A_RR_Dissolve1"5.	Ran MERGE function on "San_Martin_A_RR_Dissolve1" and "Zoning_outside_USA_Union_dissolve3" to create "Ag_Preserve_merge"6.	Ran DISSOLVE function on "Ag_Preserve_merge" to create "Ag_preserve_merge_dissolve1".USA ISSUE1.	Staff report indicated TWO contracts inside a city's USA and zoned "A" which are to be a part of the main preserve. Using the pdf "10 Agricultural Preserves" mentioned in the staff report, determined these were areas within Saratoga's USA. There were THREE contracts:68064 - Mitchell, Rowland and Ruth Trustee93005 - Lindy Farms02004 - Garrod, Vince2.	Using an EDIT session, sketched these areas suing the TRACE tool. When finished, ran the DISSOLVE tool [no dissolve field, no multipart] and called it "Ag_preserve_temp1".3.	Calculated "Area_Acres"4.	Upon reviewing the "Ag Preserve Map" the inset called "Area 2" showed a 256.1 acre area with a portion in the USA. Using an EDIT session sketched the area and ran the DISSOLVE tool and called it "Ag_preserve_temp3". This contract is 74004 - Teer, Loretta.5.	Recalculated "Area_Acres"REVIEW OF MAP1.	Reviewed Area 2 and noted southern preserve increased in size to 128 acres possibly as a result of zoning changes.2.	Reviewed Area 3 and discovered it was accidentally deleted early in the process because it was DISSOLVED with another larger area which was not a part of the original maps and therefore was missed. Added it back in using copy-paste from zoning layer, then dissolved and called it "Ag_preserve_temp_4". Recalculated Areas and noted its size was smaller due to USA being changed.3.	Area 4 seems OK4.	Area 5 is OK5.	Area 6 has a zoning problem, so had to TRACE the two HS Zones to make one poly because of the road.6.	Area 7 is OK.</idAbs>
<idCredit>@Santa Clara County - Planning Department</idCredit>
</dataIdInfo>
</metadata>
